America’s Id

David Gelernter’s essay at the Wall Street Journal is eliciting quite a bit of comment. This snippet resonated with me:

Not that every leftist hates America. But the leftists I know do hate Mr. Trump’s vulgarity, his unwillingness to walk away from a fight, his bluntness, his certainty that America is exceptional, his mistrust of intellectuals, his love of simple ideas that work, and his refusal to believe that men and women are interchangeable. Worst of all, he has no ideology except getting the job done. His goals are to do the task before him, not be pushed around, and otherwise to enjoy life.

but I don’t agree with this:

In short, he is a typical American—except exaggerated, because he has no constraints to cramp his style except the ones he himself invents.

Mr. Trump lacks constraints because he is filthy rich and always has been and, unlike other rich men, he revels in wealth and feels no need to apologize—ever. He never learned to keep his real opinions to himself because he never had to. He never learned to be embarrassed that he is male, with ordinary male proclivities. Sometimes he has treated women disgracefully, for which Americans, left and right, are ashamed of him—as they are of JFK and Bill Clinton.

And this does not resonate with me at all:

But my job as a voter is to choose the candidate who will do best for America. I am sorry about the coarseness of the unconstrained average American that Mr. Trump conveys. That coarseness is unpresidential and makes us look bad to other nations. On the other hand, many of his opponents worry too much about what other people think. I would love the esteem of France, Germany and Japan. But I don’t find myself losing sleep over it.

I don’t think this is true:

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama know their real sins. They know how appalling such people are, with their stupid guns and loathsome churches. They have no money or permanent grievances to make them interesting and no Twitter followers to speak of. They skip Davos every year and watch Fox News. Not even the very best has the dazzling brilliance of a Chuck Schumer, not to mention a Michelle Obama. In truth they are dumb as sheep.

but only because they’re not sufficiently self-aware to “know their real sins”. I don’t think that Mr. Gelernter understands politics or politicians. Few know their real sins and most have completely conflated their own personal good with the public good.

While at Reason Nick Gillespie retorts:

The most annoying (offensive?) thing about Gelernter’s piece, like others of its type, is that it presumes there really are only two possibilities, pro-Trump and anti-Trump, that swamp everything else, even traditional partisanship. Worse still, the binary hinges not on issues of substance or policy but ultimately on issues of style. To wave away Trump’s relentless cheapening of discourse—calling a porn actress to whom his personal lawyer paid $130,000 in hush money horseface is so fucked up on so many levels—is not really any different than being disgusted that he eats his steak well-done and with ketchup. Trump’s m.o. is to make everything about himself.

The best response to Trump’s general mode of discourse is to not take the bait and make everything about him and his personal preferences. There may be only two major parties in America, but the rest of the political spectrum is alive and well and the increasing number of us who are not represented by existing Republican and Democratic coalitions need to make our independent voices louder than ever. It bears repeating: Just 26 percent of Americans identify as Republican and just 27 percent of us identify as Democratic. Forty-four percent call ourselves independent.

which rings much truer to me.

I don’t think there’s anything of the “typical American” about Donald Trump and I challenge anyone to find anything in Mr. Trump’s history or actions, present or past, that would suggest that there is. I think he’s America’s id. Just as there were vague reminders of Jekyl in Hyde, there are some reminders of typical Americans in Trump. For one thing most Americans live within constraints. They aren’t just an accidental feature. They’re part of who they are.

7 comments… add one
  • All Supreme Court justices are statists. They always have been and presumably always will be.

    I don’t think there’s a single evangelical Dominionist among the present Supreme Court justices. I’d like to see a single example of the Roberts Supreme Court attempting to impose such views.

  • Andy Link

    I laughed at this:

    “Worst of all, he has no ideology except getting the job done. His goals are to do the task before him, not be pushed around, and otherwise to enjoy life.”

    No, Gillespie has it right:

    “Trump’s m.o. is to make everything about himself.”

  • Steve Link

    Another Trump supporter thinks Trump is wonderful? Yawn. He does manage to hit many persistent memes here. I don’t know any leftists who hate America, just as I don’t know many conservatives who “love” America, something they make a big deal about. When conservatives say they love America they just mean they love the parts of which they approve, or some idealized image. Trust me, they don’t love Berkley. Yes, you can probably find some leftists who hate the Confederate flag waving, Obama is a Kenyan crowd, but they will love San Francisco, or similar places.

    There is a youngish guy at Wharton who does talks on whether it is the jerk or the nice guy who gets ahead in the business world. I think there is popular perception that being a jerk is necessary for success. That Trump is the prototype. In fact the nice guys do better. I think one of the primary traits of Americans is common decency (as long as you keep us away from the internet). I see none of that in Trump.

    Steve

  • Andy Link

    I guess it depends on what “hate America” means and what standard is applied to determine that. Most people don’t say they “hate” America but they do have criticisms of America. The extremes would like to see the country remade in some way. At what level can those criticisms and that remaking reasonably be called hate?

    I tend to confine this categorization to the fringes.

  • steve Link

    “I tend to confine this categorization to the fringes.”

    Maybe it used to be, but this was from the editorial page of the WSJ, so hardly fringe anymore.

    Steve

  • Andy Link

    I’m speaking for myself, not defending WSJ editorial decisions.

  • Gray Shambler Link

    Trump is far from perfect. He’s “what America needs now”.

Leave a Comment