Addressing the Causes

You might hear some familiar chords in the take of the editors of the Wall Street Journal. After agreeing in principle with gun reform:

We aren’t opposed to sensible gun regulation if it is politically possible and might prevent such killings. So-called red-flag laws that give police the ability to deny guns to people who may pose a risk to the community have been useful in some cases. But they are hard to enforce, as we recently learned in Buffalo. New York state has a red-flag statute, and Payton Gendron was even referred for mental counseling. He still got a gun.

noting the shortcomings of that strategy they conclude:

The recent proliferation of mass shootings suggests a deeper malady than gun laws can fix. Firearm laws were few and weak before the 1970s. Yet only in recent decades have young men entered schools and supermarkets for the purpose of killing the innocent. That a teenager could look at a nine-year-old, aim a gun, and pull the trigger signals some larger social and cultural breakdown.

It also suggests that society may have to adapt by rethinking our hands-off attitudes to antisocial behavior and mental illness. Security at schools and churches will need to be enhanced. Big Data may help law enforcement identify potential risks, and we may need to give them freer rein to intervene in borderline cases. A return to more social sanction and intervention for antisocial behavior would also help the vulnerable and lost who most need help.

The modern welfare state is adept at writing checks, but not much else. Today’s young killers aren’t motivated by material deprivation. They are typically from middle-class families with access to smartphones and X-boxes. Their deficit is social and spiritual. The rise of family dysfunction and the decline of mediating institutions such as churches and social clubs have consequences.

This cultural erosion will take years to repair, but a good start would be to admit that it plays a role in the increasing acts of insensate violence. It would also help if someone brave enough to mention the problem—recall Joe Lieberman and Tipper Gore —isn’t derided as a cultural dinosaur.

As I said to my wife in the wake of the first reports of the shootings in Uvalde, the key to ending such tragedies isn’t by trying to make them impossible but to make them unthinkable. Guns are tools not toys or status symbols. They shouldn’t be romanticized and their use shouldn’t be glorified.

Admitting that there are social and cultural problems are key. Blaming the problem on those darned gun nuts may help you let off steam but it only addresses a tiny part of the problem. The diminution of all institutions other than the state, e.g. clubs, churches, marriage, the family, is part of the problem. Indeed, assuming more laws will correct the problem is part of the problem. It reminds me of Mussolini’s dictum: “All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.” Something else that should be considered is that if you want more laws, you necessarily want more law enforcement, and that in turn means more discrimination against blacks.

8 comments… add one
  • Drew Link

    “Guns are tools not toys or status symbols. They shouldn’t be romanticized and their use shouldn’t be glorified.”

    And this gets to the heart of the matter. Pollyanna’s and illiterates want to blame the instrument, or “gun culture.” The vast majority, approaching 98-99%, of gun owners are serious people and safety nuts. They recoil at the notion of indiscriminate gun bans.

    Its the 1-2% who are mental cases or just plain criminals who cause the problems.

    What does that tell you? Is it the gun or the person. We spend far too little time on the mind and the culture. In Wakeshaw a guy ran down people with a car. That story is now buried. We are not serious about this issue. We are political.

    As noted in an earlier comment, I could support an age restriction on gun ownership. Perhaps even restrictions on AK’s and the like. But I know the anti-gun nuts will just move on to the next beachhead. So the Maginot line stays at AK’s. They are every bit to blame as the NRA.

  • Jan Link

    ”Admitting that there are social and cultural problems are key. Blaming the problem on those darned gun nuts may help you let off steam but it only addresses a tiny part of the problem.”

    I am totally in agreement that guns are merely “tools” used to carry out demented intentions. A person’s finger pulls the trigger, initiated first by a very warped mind. Why there are so many deviant minds – what social safeguards are missing in society – is what needs to be pursued.

  • Jan Link

    Just read Drew’s comment and he’s spot on about if you give a little on restricting certain guns, or gun rights, the left will only ask for more. They are not satisfied with political compromises, and seem to view such compromises as a weakness or an opening to get even more from your opponents.

  • bob sykes Link

    “and that in turn means more discrimination against blacks”

    Young black underclass males are disproportionately responsible for violent crime, at at least 8 times the rate for whites. Of necessity, the requires disproportionate arrests and incarcerations. There is a reason why our prisons are so heavily black.

    And that is NOT discrimination against blacks. It is the consequence of black behavior.

    In as much as the problem is cultural (and genetic), the fact that we are getting almost 3 million immigrants a year from Second and Third World countries (less than 700,000 legal) means that our culture will morph into Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East. The old Anglo culture of the founders will disappear. Already, whites are a minority among 15 years olds, so the transition from traditional America to, say, Mexico, or Brazil, or South Africa, or Afghanistan is upon us. And we will have Third World crime rates and Third World corruption, especially political, and a Third World economy. It’s a package deal.

  • Drew Link

    O/T

    There has not been a post on the economy in a while. But readers may be interested in a datapoint I made recently. Consumers have blown through covid savings, real wages are declining and key consumer expenditures (gas and food) draining them……………they are loading up their credit cards.

    I have no idea how long this can go on, but its not sustainable indefinitely.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/us-savings-rate-crashes-lowest-lehman-feds-favorite-inflation-signal-near-40-year

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    If one goes beyond the political constraints (which are pretty paramount); then I believe

    a) Skepticism about gun ownership by males under the age of 40. I believe something like 90-98% of crimes with guns and practically all mass shootings involve males under the age of 40.

    b) That restrictions on ammunition are more effective then restrictions on guns. Ammunition is a consumable, and is harder to “DIY” then guns with techniques like 3d printing, or part assembly.

    c) Violence in media does have an effect, just as bodies are what one eats, minds are what one sees, read, hear. I know of studies that show violence has a minimal effect on society in aggregate — but can violence in media have an effect on outliers — and its outliers that do mass shootings.

    d) As a society; it would be tragic if schools must be turned into a fortress; like a federal building. Pandemics already caused many parents to switch to home-schooling.

  • As a society; it would be tragic if schools must be turned into a fortress; like a federal building

    It’s a tragedy that federal buildings and government buildings generally have been turned into fortresses. Other than during wartime security at the White House itself was quite lax until 1901. Year after year since then it’s been getting tighter and tighter. Barricades. Closing the streets to vehicular traffic.

  • steve Link

    The fault of the shooting always lies with the shooter. It shouldn’t be blamed upon others. That said the gun lobby/gun nuts make sure we cannot address the problem. They keep us from doing research on the issue. They make sure we cant do anything that might help. We cant really address the mentally ill. In order to keep that group from shooting we would have to eliminate ownership by a lot fo people since we arent good at predicting which of the many mentally ill which actually shoot someone. It would include people who are severely depressed and people with paranoid ideation. Guess who buys lots of guns? Those paranoid nuts. It means that the gun nuts will keep guns in the house no matter what.

    My former BIL was suicidal much of his life but wasn’t successful in killing himself until he was 50. I kept guns out of the house until after he was dead. There is a common theme that so many of these people were mentally ill? There is also a common theme that that there were guns in the house. What the hell was the family doing keeping guns in the house when they knew one of the kids was a whack job? Just to beat an old horse look at Rittenhouse. A 17 y/o with no training and the emotional maturity of a turnip takes a gun to a riot. He leaves the adults and goes off on his own with his gun into a crowd. With no experience anon training that was never going to end well. Now the gun nuts make him a hero. Responsible gun ownership my ass!

    So yes most gun owners are responsible. Most actually favor some restrictions that at the margins might make a difference. But the true hard core gun nuts make sure nothing will happen. Any possible limitation means confiscation is around the corner when in fact confiscation doesnt happen. If anything gun laws have been on a trend of loosening.

    Steve

Leave a Comment