As we near the end of the year I’m seeing quite a few predictions for next year, many of them either unremarkable or preposterous. This morning on a lark I asked ChatGPT what its predictions were for 2026. Here are the results:
- AI spending hits a credibility wall in the form of pushback from boards of directors and CFOs for immediate measurable results from adopting AI.
- A visible tiering of AI users emerges among power users, occasional users, or institutional avoiders including government, regulated professions, and unions.
- White-collar hiring freezes spread, not layoffs
- One major AI firm retreats from “frontier” scaling away from ever-larger models toward efficiency, specialization, or verticalization.
- Electricity becomes a binding constraint. It should be noted that will give an edge to China in the adoption of AI.
- Courts quietly restrict AI use in legal proceedings
- Medical AI stalls at the liability boundary
- A backlash against “AI fluency” hiring language
- The first serious AI-driven outsourcing reversal appears. Work previously offshored will be reshored not to human workers but to AI.
- Public discourse shifts from “Can AI do X?” to “Who is responsible?”
Some of those are verbatim. Some are paraphrases. If you asked the same question I suspect the answer would vary considerably. After several years of regular use on my part ChatGPT has a pretty fair sampling of how to respond to me. YMMV.
I asked several follow-up questions. I may report on those in the coming year.







In completely unrelated news, I just found out my cousin’s husband is currently the longest serving active judge in Illinois with 50 years of service.
https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/News/1646/Justice-James-A-Knecht-from-Hickeys-Billiards-to-the-longest-serving-active-judge-in-Illinois/news-detail/