They Just Walked Away

In her most recent Washington Post column Megan McArdle expresses optimism about the future of American cities:

Hell is other people, wrote Sartre, and especially on the crosstown bus. They’re hellacious indeed with a deadly virus running around. Such inconveniences drove the middle class out in mid-century, hastened by rising crime and, yes, the riots. Why shouldn’t we expect to see a second exodus now, when software is making it easier than ever to work where you please?

In the short run, perhaps we will; San Francisco rents dropped nearly 10 percent in May, after tech giants announced that they’d be making their work-from-home arrangements permanent. But of course, falling prices make cities more attractive despite declining amenities; that’s why people stayed in Detroit even when the jobs left.

Nor are the problems of the cities quite as dire as they were in the 1960s. Zoom simply isn’t as revolutionary as the automobile. The car was better than the buggy on almost every dimension. But Zoom strips out vital social cues and skips the casual conversations at the office coffee pot that can spark new ideas or solutions to old problems. It might ultimately augment smaller offices; it is unlikely to substitute for them entirely.

Nonetheless, some will no doubt pick up and leave for the immediate future. But eventually the viral threat will most likely fade, either because we all got a vaccine or because we all got covid-19. Would-be rusticators will remember that you still cannot easily drink a cocktail, find a mate, groom a sales prospect or eat a meal over Zoom. And then cities will grow again, as they have over the millennia, despite even more daunting threats than covid-19 or abusive cops: because what’s there isn’t anywhere else except, maybe, in another city.

That suggests that I make some predictions about the aftermath of this annus horribilis:

  • Cities whose populations have been declining like Chicago, St. Louis, and Detroit will see the declines accelerate.
  • Cities whose populations have increased due to greater numbers of immigrants like New York and Los Angeles will see declines.
  • The operating costs of cities will increase sharply while revenues decrease.
  • 2020 has been what the insurance biz calls a “capital event”. Some insurances companies will not survive and will be acquired by other, larger companies.
  • The stockholders of large publicly-held companies will not be eager to invest in declining cities. That includes grocery chains, drugstore chains, and big box stores, many of which have been looted during the recent upheavals.
  • For some who’ve lost their jobs during the lockdowns unemployment will become permanent.
  • For some remote work-from-home will become permanent. That will tend to reduce the value of office space, real estate values, and taxes that can be realized from real estate.
  • Most sit-down restaurants will not be able to survive with legally mandated social distancing. Or on carry out alone. That will have a run-on effect on property taxes.

Said another way COVID-19, government fecklessness, mass demonstrations, looting, and uncertainty will accelerate pre-existing conditions.

Over the last half century archaeologists have learned an enormous amount about the Maya civilization. They preserved their history with a writing system that has only recently been recognized as a writing system and deciphered. They had sophisticated mathematics and astronomy as well as complex systems of trade and law.

By and large their cities were not destroyed by war or famine or environmental change. The people just walked away leaving empty cities. They just walked away.

5 comments… add one
  • Guarneri Link

    “Said another way COVID-19, government fecklessness, mass demonstrations, looting, and uncertainty will accelerate pre-existing conditions.”

    I was going to go dot point to dot point, but this says it all. I’m not a card player, but I think the poker guys call those dot points or summary a royal flush.

    “Uncertainty” is all encompassing, but more specifically add the current and anticipated increasing tax burden, housing price declines, restrictions to civil liberties and inevitable crime increase due to inane police defunding nostrums and you have it.

    I think many or most of the defenders of these idiotic (50 years of total control) Democrat policies in NYC, LA, Chicago, Balt, Philly, St Louis etc etc will want to rationalize. But its BS. The pols, and those who have voted them in have simply shot their dicks off. They are doing it as we speak.

    Dismiss this at your peril, city dwellers: Dinner on Friday with our RE broker – who is not a broker, but a real live and very professional relocation consultant – yields stories of Chicago/IL (she is from Libertyville), all NE cities flooding her with requests. One guy bought based upon iPhone videos. 30 minutes and done. Business is booming for relo. Booming.

    Look up these communities: The Cliffs, The American Cub, Kiawah Island, Reynolds Plantation, Colleton River, Berkeley Hall, Palmetto Bluff, St Simon Island, Grey Oaks, Quail West…. or areas – Cashiers, NC, Vero Beach, FL………I could go on. I either live or have lived in or investigated all of them. And I haven’t even touched AZ or TX. Prices are not declining right now. They are increasing. If you take the time to look you will realize this is not the low taxpaying crowd. And they are growing at the expense of these Democrat strongholds.
    The residuals in the norther cities will experience a declining quality of life, but its mostly a self inflicted wound. So sad and so unnecessary.

    Megan is delusional. There are some of the great steak or fish houses, and eclectic (Spanish, Peruvian, upper end Continental etc) I’ve ever been to in these locations. Only the best of the best French in NYC is generally not available elsewhere. (OK, OK, I haven’t been able to locate a good traditional Wisconsin Supper Club – rather under-rated if you find a good one) The other attractions will gravitate. Maybe not The Lyric or The CSO. But plenty to do.

    Its a structural change, unfortunate, and as I say, a self inflicted wound. But go ahead, keep drinking the poison and pulling the Dem lever because Orange Man Bad. Go ahead. And then quityerbitchin.

  • jan Link

    That was a thought provoking commentary, Dave. I think you made reasonable points regarding possible directions city life may go – mainly a trend away from big cities, when at all possible.

    It’s sad, though, because cities had been making a comeback in some of the older areas, attracting those who enjoyed the stimulation and grittiness of urban life. However, with creeping homelessness taking over many city niches, negatively impacting daily street experiences, followed by tone deaf responses from city leaders to address these problems, there has been growing discontent brewing, even before the latest round of virus lockdowns and riots. Now we have calls to defund police departments, leaders seem to be capitulating to anti law and order screeds, graffiti and criminal acting-out are no longer deemed punishable acts, and civility has been replaced by uncivilized mobs, the urban allure is vanishing.

    Once the economical effects of the national shutdown is more fully realized, cities will be further demoralized, teetering on fiscal collapse, as an increasing number of commercial spaces go vacant, unemployed people stress out, and public unrest becomes more palpable in groupings other than BLM.

    Yeah, the uncomplicated, safer environment of a smaller town will start looking better and better……

  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    I’ll be devils advocate and point out factors that go against urban flight.

    Urban growth boundaries — By law, much of the land to build new housing in the suburbs are off-limits.

    Urban areas are car-unfriendly — Many cities are accelerating a trend to go “car-less” or “car-lite”; where much of a city is inaccessible by car. Again, this makes living in the suburbs and commuting by car a less viable alternative.

    This time, moving to the suburbs in many cases is not on the table — one would need to move further out; maybe even to a different state. The increased cost means less people will do it.

  • Guarneri Link

    I obviously could be wrong, curious. But I think people are going to hop scotch over the suburbs and to different states, as you point out. This is a fundamental change, because the issues are fundamental and deeply structural.

    Going from downtown Chicago to Naperville, Hinsdale or Lake Forest is one thing. Moving to the Carolinas or FL or AZ is another. If the Di Blasios, Cuomos or Lightfoots of the world could have a sober, reflective period they might arrest this process. But I’m watching them double down. I think they are constitutionally incapable and politically beholden. You tell me why. But that’s what people are looking at when they say no mas. They see no light at the end of the tunnel. I recall the day when I thought I would never, ever move from Chicagoland.

  • GreyShambler Link

    If the Mayans had had transfer programs those cities may have had a residual population for centuries. That would have been an interesting sight. An entire city whose major industry were collection of charity.

Leave a Comment