I know I’ve bitched about this ad nauseam, but it would be nice if Sumner would advance beyond the same vague playbook of:
#1. NGDP
#2. Monetary Stimulus
#3. Use #2 to make #1.
That’s the entire damned post: “We need to use monetary stimulus to make the economy grow faster.” I encourage him to give me a call once he figures out how to do that.
I know I’ve bitched about this ad nauseam, but it would be nice if Sumner would advance beyond the same vague playbook of:
#1. NGDP
#2. Monetary Stimulus
#3. Use #2 to make #1.
That’s the entire damned post: “We need to use monetary stimulus to make the economy grow faster.” I encourage him to give me a call once he figures out how to do that.
It struck me that way, too. That’s why I gave the post the title I did.
@Dave Schuler
Yeah, I’ve finally gotten used to the subtlety and inference in your writing. I like it.
Macro-economic planning by Underwear Gnome.
But they’re underpants made in the good old U. S. of A., dagnab it!
That’s the entire damned post: “We need to use monetary stimulus to make the economy grow faster.â€
As opposed to “We need to use deficits to make the economy grow faster.”?
@Steve Verdon
And your batting average for failing to pay attention to anything I’ve written on this subject continues to be 1.000. Nice try.
But they’re underpants made in the good old U. S. of A., dagnab it!
LMAO!
Right back at ya Ben. I bring up points you ignore them. No point in talking to you really, that is why I use the snide comments and the snark.