The debate on Iran continues

There’s more discussion of the situation in Iran going on in the blogosphere:

This discussion on Blue Force has some good resources for coming to a better understanding of the situation.

Aziz at Dean’s World comes to a position not unlike my own.

Rick Moran of Right Wing Nut House has a good analysis on where Iran really stands in its nuclear development program.

Democracy Arsenal draws attention to an article by Joe Cirincione of the Carnegie Endowment cautioning against using military options in Iran.

David Sanger in The New York Times examines the nature of military options in dealing with Iran.

More hints about military action against Iran by Israel. I don’t believe it for reasons I’ve already explained in my post, Options on Iran II.

Fareed Zakaria argues for containment.

The Telegraph reports that Iran has enlarged the uranium enrichment at Natanz. This further calls into question the 10 year horizon for an Iranian nuclear weapon proposed by some.

0 comments… add one

Leave a Comment