One Way or the Other

In response to the New York Times’s publishing of an accusation against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh which, apparently, has no confirming evidence or testimony, Washington Post columnist writes:

The story, since modified to include crucial information, was an adapted excerpt from a book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh,” written by two Times staff writers, Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly. In it, the authors reported allegations by a Yale classmate that Kavanaugh was at a “drunken dorm party” where “friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student.”

Setting aside the logistics of such a feat, more eye-popping was the omission from the original Times piece that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed for the book — and, according to friends, doesn’t remember any such incident .

Such an oversight is inexcusable.

The Times added these details to the story after they were flagged by the Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway, who had an advance copy of the book. The Times writers, who said the details had been in the excerpt’s initial draft, made media rounds Monday and Tuesday to explain the omission, and essentially blamed editors, who, they said, “in the haste” of trying to close out production, had deleted the reference.

The facts that the alleged victim refused to be interviewed by the authors, and apparently told friends that she doesn’t recall any such incident, amount to the very definition of a non-story. For the record, The Post learned of the accusation last year but declined to publish it because the alleged witnesses weren’t identified and the woman said to be involved refused to comment.

Indeed, the authors’ only sources for the claim were two unnamed officials who spoke to Washington attorney Max Stier, who last year apparently told the FBI and various senators that he witnessed the alleged incident. But Stier refused to talk to the Times writers himself.

Some Democratic contenders for the presidency immediately called for Kavanaugh’s impeachment. They include Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), Sen. Kamala D. Harris (Calif.), former Rep. Beto O’Rourke (Tex.) and South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg.

Sens. Warren and Harris should be ashamed of themselves. They are attorneys and officers of the court and as such have responsibilities that transcend those of politics which they have violated by joining in the scrum. That is what being a professional means.

In the United Kingdom it is a commonplace for newspapers to be aligned with one political party or another but in the UK they have libel laws which would have rendered the New York Times a target for a likely successful libel suit. We either need a non-partisan press or libel laws suitable to our present reality.

10 comments… add one
  • CuriousOnlooker Link

    It is one thing to go to 11 to prevent someone from serving on the Supreme Court.

    It’s another to go to 11 on a sitting Supreme Court justice – alienate 5 and even things like the legal definition of libel can be altered.

    For the record; I understand the research that came to light since the confirmation hearings make the original accusations less credible. The key friend named by Ms Ford as with her at the alleged incident – Leland Keyser; outright states her skepticism; and the pressure she was placed last year to “alter” her recollections or face adverse consequences.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/17/key-witness-brett-kavanaugh-saga-comes-down-his-side/?outputType=amp

  • jan Link

    The protests, allegations, dredging up decade’s ago episodes of youthful indulgences, over Kavanaugh’s SCOTUS’s appointment, is both unreal and unnerving to me. It seems that due process and fair scrutiny into a candidate’s worthiness of any government office is all but gone, as confirmation seems to primarily depend on ideological beliefs and a person’s lockstep performance to that ideology. Just look at AZ’s progressive left trying to censor one of their own for being “too centrist.”

  • Guarneri Link

    I understand The WaPo and others trying to put a highbrow, if critical, veneer on this issue. Others are more in the boys will be boys camp.

    But I find this antiseptic treatment lacking. Opinion shows on cable, or the editorial pages of newspapers, are one thing. Buyer beware. Supposed news is another. The phrase journalism is dead is not hyperbole. The country is not well served by this development.

  • I feel obligated to mention the compulsory whataboutery of the treatment of Barack Obama’s citizenship. That was wrong but two wrongs do not make a right. Also, it would have helped if Obama had not cast doubt on his birth status himself.

  • steve Link

    It sounds like the book does nothing to make a stronger case against Kavanaugh, so this should just be dropped. Calls for impeachment are overwrought.

    ” They are attorneys and officers of the court and as such have responsibilities that transcend those of politics”

    But in reality nothing transcends politics. We have no shortage of examples of this for both parties. There is no penalty for this kind of behavior. In fact, it seems to be rewarded. It proves that you were willing to attack the liberals/conservatives and endears you to your voters. IOW we get what we incentivize.

    Steve

  • jan Link

    Dave,

    I can’t help but point out that Obama withheld his long form birth certificate for some time, raising unnecessary suspicions he had something to hide. Then there was Obama’s literary publisher citing his birthplace as Kenya, for 17 years, until 2007, when Obama was running for president. Finally, there are citations from Obama’s own aunt asserting she witnessed his birth in Kenya, collaborated by his half brother. Cap all this off with HRC’s sidekick, Sidney Blumenthal, being the one who initially marketed the plausibility of Obama’s birthplace being in Kenya with the McClatchy News.

    Generally speaking, there was a lot of noise and confusion swirling around #44’s past — most having origins with democrats running against him and Obama himself (for not correcting his biography earlier).

  • Grey Shambler Link

    I know we’re straying but I’ve always wondered if Obama allowed and or encouraged his “Kenyan birth”in order to gain admission to Harvard as an exchange student. Those records are sealed too, you know. But still, even if he did, you have to give him credit for not letting principle get in the way of ambition.

    Truth is, especially today, in politics, the gloves are off. The editors and owners of the Times personal lives are fair game as well.

  • TastyBits Link

    @jan

    I can’t help but point out that Obama withheld his long form birth certificate for some time, raising unnecessary suspicions he had something to hide.

    The same could be said of President Trump’s tax returns.

    Then there was Obama’s literary publisher citing his birthplace as Kenya, for 17 years, until 2007, when Obama was running for president.

    Now, you have something.

    I tried to explain the difference to @steve, but he has caught Trump Derangement Syndrome.

  • Allegra Link

    I am very late to this subject, but wanted to get this off my chest.
    Re: the claim that “Obama withheld his long form birth certificate for some time, raising unnecessary suspicions he had something to hide.” There were many who felt that Obama should not release his birth certificate, since Trump et al would no doubt say it was fake….which is exactly what happened.
    It was Obama’s grandmother who spoke on the phone with someone who clearly had an agenda, and misrepresented what was said on the phone call.

    https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/apr/07/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-president-obamas-grandmother-cau/

  • Allegra Link

    As to Obama’s literary agent. Miriam Goderich was the literary agent who edited the text of the bio on a booklet about Obama, and the contents of the client list. She said:

    “You’re undoubtedly aware of the brouhaha stirred up by Breitbart about the erroneous statement in a client list Acton & Dystel published in 1991 (for circulation within the publishing industry only) that Barack Obama was born in Kenya. This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me — an agency assistant at the time,” Goderich wrote. “There was never any information given to us by Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii. I hope you can communicate to your readers that this was a simple mistake and nothing more.”

    Why 17 years? Who would have been seeking information on a Junior Senator from Illinois prior to his running for president in 2007?

    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/promotional-booklet/

    Could we please not forget that the people who bought into the “confusion” about the location of Obama’s birth never responded to the fact that it wouldn’t have mattered where he was born, since he was born of an American mother, a citizen of the US. He could have been born in Kenya, or Singapore, or Stockholm, for that matter.

Leave a Comment