New York’s Hospitals

You may recall that yesterday we were discussing the reasons that we don’t have as many hospital beds as might otherwise be the case. Reasons proposed included that they weren’t necessary, the increasing move to outpatient procedures, certificates of need, and other factors. This morning the editors of the Wall Street Journal have another culprit in mind affecting New York State in particular—low Medicaid reimbursement rates:

Twenty some hospitals have closed in New York City alone over the last two decades, most located in low-income communities. Statewide the number of hospital beds per-capita has fallen by 13% since 2010, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. The number of beds across the U.S has also decreased due to declining demand as care has shifted to lower-cost outpatient centers. But New York hospitals have been closing due to financial duress amid increasing demand by low-income patients.

Blame New York’s miserly Medicaid program, which reimburses providers far below the cost of care. Physicians are on average compensated at 56% of what Medicare pays—the fourth lowest in the country after Rhode Island, New Jersey and California—and Medicare also pays below cost. Hospitals typically make up for paltry government payments by charging privately insured patients more, but hospitals that treat mostly Medicaid and Medicare patients don’t have this option.

Many doctors in New York also don’t accept Medicaid patients because of low payment rates, so low-income folks stream to emergency rooms when they’re sick. This has caused a financial contagion among hospitals. When one closes, patients flock to others nearby and increase their financial strain.

Recall how Democrats claimed that expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act to individuals up to 133% of the poverty line would reduce emergency-room visits. This hasn’t happened. Emergency-room visits per capita in New York have ticked up 3% since the ACA expansion took effect in 2014 and 7% since 2010.

While expanding Medicaid enrollment, Mr. Cuomo in 2014 sought to rationalize costs with an $8 billion federal grant for putative payment reforms aimed at reducing ER visits. “Will it mean some hospital beds are reduced?” Mr. Cuomo said at the time. “Yes, because that is the point of the exercise. You will have a decrease in beds.”

I cannot testify as to the veracity of this claim. I also have some problems with how they’re framing the issue in particular because most of the costs in health care are wages and I don’t believe you can have a market in health care services as long as 60% of the freight is borne by Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal, state, or local government programs.

I’m just passing this along as more fuel for the fire.

7 comments… add one
  • GreyShambler Link

    You can add illegals to the uninsured. When they become too large a burden, they can actually cause hospitals to close.
    I noticed at a recent press conference, spokesman for ICE when asked about new quick deportation procedures said yes, they will be taken to an airfield and flown to their country of origin.
    No one in the press said boo.
    We care, but not quite to the point of giving them our ventilator.
    Fear changes everything.

  • We care, but not quite to the point of giving them our ventilator.

    On the other hand…
    https://twitter.com/Johnthemadmonk/status/1242197589027676167?s=20

  • GreyShambler Link

    An inspiration.
    Those ventilators, as I understand it, given the duration of this disease, and the fact that the patient has to be slowly weaned off of them if they recover, means intubating a patient ties up a bed and ventilator for up to a month. No wonder things back up.

  • jan Link

    I saw that twitter notation yesterday illuminating that act of self sacrifice. Eventually a book will be published detailing some of the many cameos showcasing the goodness spontaneously flowing from one person to another during this shut-down. Unfortunately, though, another chapter should be devoted to the underbelly of greed and avarice that has also surfaced alongside the deeds of selflessness.

  • steve Link

    When you work in this field and you read health care policy regularly, not just when you want to criticize someone, it is so irritating when someone discovers something that has been going on for many years and announce it as though it is new so they can pin the blame on someone they don’t like. Inner city and rural hospitals have been failing for a long time. This is not new. The pts are poor. If they didnt have Medicaid they would have no insurance at all. 56% of what you normally make is a lot more than if you make nothing. Why dont they understand that? Oh, right. These are the same guys who didnt understand that 125% mortgages and liar’s loans weren’t a good idea.
    (Also, of note, the evidence for cost shifting is fairly weak. It occurs but not as much as some think.)

    Steve

  • Guarneri Link

    “…it is so irritating when someone discovers something that has been going on for many years and announce it as though it is new so they can pin the blame on someone they don’t like.”

    You mean like Democrats and media – but I repeat myself – have been doing with too few ICU beds, respirators, ventilators…..

    Yeah, I know what you mean.

  • steve Link

    Too few tests. We still don’t have those. So what is your prediction when your leaders words come true? “If you want a test, you can get one.” I am thinking another week or two.

    Steve

Leave a Comment