Maybe Not So Out of Africa

While I’m on the subject of old bones, there’s another recent paleoanthropological find that could throw the prevailing theory of human origins into a cocked hat:

Teeth found near Rosh Ha’ayin, Israel, have been dated older than any other homo sapiens previously uncovered in Africa. Until now, remains of humans from only 200,000 years ago have been found in Africa, and the accepted approach has been that modern man originated on that continent.

The cave was uncovered in 2000 by Prof. Avi Gopher and Dr. Ran Barkai of Tel Aviv University (TAU) Institute of Archaeology. Later, Prof. Israel Hershkowitz of the Department of Anatomy and Anthropology at TAU’s Sackler School of Medicine and an international team of scientists performed a morphological analysis on the teeth found in the cave.

The Qesem Cave is dated between 400,000 and 200,000 years ago, and archaeologists working there believe that the findings indicate significant changes in the behaviour of ancient man. This period of time was crucial in the history of mankind from cultural and biological perspectives, and the fact that teeth of modern man were discovered indicates that these changes were apparently related to evolutionary changes taking place at that time, the researchers maintained.

The significance of these findings, as noted above, is that, if the dating on them holds, they predate the oldest anatomically modern human remains found in Africa. That in turns casts the theory that modern humans spread from Africa and spread from there into some doubt. A lack of evidence can do that.

However, Africa’s substantial human genetic diversity makes me wonder if older human remains aren’t lurking there somewhere, possibly buried somewhere in the forbidding Sahara.

7 comments… add one
  • sam Link

    I think some Chinese anthropologists have argued for multiple points for the evolution of modern humans. Wherever homo ergaster went (and he went all over the place, evidently), there homo sapiens arose.

  • I consider the recommendations of Chinese scholars with some skepticism. They’ve been making their history up for a millennium.

  • sam Link

    Yeah, I detected some chauvinism in that claim when I first encountered it.

  • john personna Link

    Heh, I’m not sure “they’ve been making up their history longer than anyone” is a complete strike against them.

  • I do. Chinese scholars set out willfully to create a history for China nearly 1,000 years ago out of whole cloth. They just made stuff up. Rubes in the Western world and in China have been believing it ever since.

  • PD Shaw Link

    I wonder if Israel has the most archealogical excavations in it’s territory per sq. km. ? If so, where you look is where you’ll find.

  • The significance of these findings, as noted above, is that, if the dating on them holds, they predate the oldest anatomically modern human remains found in Africa. That in turns casts the theory that modern humans spread from Africa and spread from there into some doubt. A lack of evidence can do that.

    There’s many a slip betwixt cup and lip.

    -We don’t know that these teeth are from homo sapiens.
    -We don’t know that this group, if not homo sapiens, gave rise to modern humans.
    -We don’t know that this group evolved in the region.

Leave a Comment